MINDD – DEFENSE OF RIGHTS DENOUNCES – PERSECUTED LAWYERS: HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATED – DEMOCRACY THREATENED – ADVOGADOS PERSEGUIDOS : DIREITOS HUMANOS VIOLADOS : DEMOCRACIA AMEAÇADA
- The political and institutional persecution against the lawyers of the victims of foreclosure frauds, of the denial of the natural judge and of due process of law, of financial abuses, of forged proceedings—null and void ab initio due to the direct affront to the fundamental principles of the Democratic State under the Rule of Law—and of judicial corruption in the courts of the United States of America, especially in fraudulent mortgage foreclosures and also in guardianship and family court proceedings, has reached unimaginable levels in a country that calls itself a DEMOCRATIC STATE UNDER THE RULE OF LAW.
- In addition to the atrocities committed covertly, both inside and outside the courts, the persecution waged against lawyers—by those who, in theory and under the law, should punish the lawyers responsible for abuses and defend the Constitution and the advocates who dare to denounce corruption, in accordance with the guiding principles of judicial conduct and the duties and oath of the legal profession—causes astonishment and indignation to any decent person who has even the slightest knowledge of the truth of the facts.
- From north to south, from east to west, elderly people, women, family fathers, relatives, psychiatrists, and honorable lawyers raise their voices, hoping to be heard.However, what is observed is the political capture of institutions and bar associations that literally prevent access to fair justice, according to the numerous complaints received and the documentation presented and analyzed.The lawyer is indispensable to the Administration of Justice and to the defense of the Democratic State under the Rule of Law.
- The impeccable defense of Scott Erik Stafne is aligned with the two pillars of the Democratic State under the Rule of Law enshrined in the Constitution of the United States of America, with legal doctrine, and with international human rights treaties.
- Read the comparative and reasoned legal analysis of the Constitutional Doctrine defended by Stafne: Analysis of “Robert Brandom and His Pragmatist Philosophy in Law” Supporting Scott Erik Stafne’s Constitutional Doctrine.
- When the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) closes its eyes and ears to all the complaints and petitions of the victims of severe violence and human rights violations, and persecutes and punishes the lawyers who defend them, this is not an individual problem—it is a matter of public law and general repercussion.
- See, for instance, the paradigmatic case of the disciplinary administrative proceeding improperly initiated by the WSBA against the People’s Lawyer – SCOTT ERIK STAFNE.
- This is evident retaliation against one who dares to defend the Constitutional Doctrine of the Founding Fathers of the Nation and the inalienable human rights of the American people.
- We are following the developments of this case, in which manipulations within the administrative process—including the removal, without just cause and without any explanation, of the initially designated rapporteur—raise serious doubts about the real political interests involved.